In this chapter, I do not understand about constructivism. It doesn’t appear to be a learning method. My understanding of constructivist articles is to build a learning plan by yourself, and learners need to change the learning plan according to their own situation. This method seems to be more in line with the needs of different people. But this method is not suitable for beginners, such as teenagers, or people who are just learning. I think constructivism has limitations in its application.
In this article, I feel that learning the concept of cognitivism is somewhat difficult. The article has been talking about psychological problems. I tried to understand what the article said by reading it repeatedly. And connect it with the knowledge I have learned before. This allows me to better understand the content.
My major is economics and I have challenges while studying ECON203. This course is about intermediate microeconomics . I took behaviorism to learn. I will set a learning goal, such as how many scores I have reached in the midterm exam. Then I sort out the notes and check for omissions. If the old knowledge is not understood, you will learn the old knowledge and then learn the new knowledge. The results of the midterm exam met expectations, which is a positive feedback.
My best learning experience was learning to draw. My hobby is painting. I learned the basic theory and foundation of drawing at a young age. After constantly looking at the works of famous people and constantly changing my painting style, my understanding of painting will also change. The original theoretical basis has limitations. Memory is constantly rebuilt during the learning process. Learning to draw is a long process, and it took me about 10 years. Up to now, I still use new media to draw, such as ipad, ps. With each new material added, it took a lot of practice. And you can learn by analogy. This kind of learning is joyful and memorable.
Behaviorism: The teacher will strengthen the memory of the students through continuous practice. Some small tests can be designed to consolidate memory, and there are some small rewards for students with good grades.
Cognitivism: Teachers mobilize students’ enthusiasm for participation in learning. Some weather phenomena can be compared to things that students are familiar with. And can show some related examples.
Constructivism: Teachers can allow students to create their own learning plans, which can meet different learning needs. The learning goal is to be able to apply the acquired knowledge to daily life.
In my middle school and high school study life, I will do a lot of after-school exercises to ensure the consolidation of knowledge.
In the process of uvic learning. I will use diagrams to divide my notes. And use mind maps to organize learning ideas.
In the process of learning to paint, I will absorb new painting experience and apply the knowledge to my new works.
From what I’ve read, my teaching is closer to cognitivism. I will layer knowledge so that different groups of people can learn. I like to use mind maps to organize my notes and thought process. Use more discussions to exercise learners’ dialectical thinking. Like cognitivism says, memory is constantly changing. I see learning as a process that affects learners’ values and thinking
Hi Lidong! I just wanted to say thank you for sharing your insights into three learning theories. Your perspective on the subject is really valuable, and I appreciate the effort you put into explaining the differences between them. You mentioned that you have challenges with understanding constructivism.
Constructivism is a theory that emphasizes the importance of hands-on learning and active engagement in the learning process. This approach to education has been shown to be effective in helping students develop critical thinking skills and a deeper understanding of the material. By encouraging students to explore and experiment with materials and ideas, constructivism helps to foster creativity and innovation. In addition, constructivism encourages students to take ownership of their learning, which can lead to increased motivation and engagement.
While constructivism can be a highly effective learning approach, it may present challenges for students who struggle with metacognitive awareness. Fortunately, teachers can play a critical role in supporting these students by providing guidance and feedback that helps them develop a deeper understanding of their own learning processes. By working closely with these students and providing them with the tools and resources they need to succeed, teachers can help them overcome these challenges and achieve success in their academic pursuits.
If you have any further questions or would like more information on these topics, please don’t hesitate to let me know.